Will US Arrest Tinubu Over FBI Records? Former Texas Mayor Wades In
- Former Blanco, Texas mayor Mike Arnold made a bold claim about President Bola Ahmed Tinubu's safety during an interview ahead of the UNGA summit
- Laolu Akande, an ally of former Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, conducted the interview as part of pre-UNGA coverage in the US
- Arnold, who founded Africa Arise International, spoke on the programme Inside Sources, monitored by Legit.ng
PAY ATTENTION: Find it fast with our new search feature at Legit.ng!
Legit.ng journalist Ridwan Adeola Yusuf has over 8 years of experience covering metro, government policy, and international issues.
FCT, Abuja - Mike Arnold, a former mayor of Blanco, Texas, has said that the United States (US) will not arrest Nigerian President Bola Tinubu, making the assertion ahead of the 2026 United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) summit scheduled to open in New York on Tuesday, September 22.
Arnold, who is also the founder of Africa Arise International, made the claim during an appearance on the programme 'Inside Sources', where he was interviewed by Laolu Akande, a former presidential aide.
Source: Facebook
Akande had been conducting a series of interviews across Texas, New York and Washington, DC.
The interviews formed part of pre-summit coverage ahead of the annual General Debate of the UNGA.
Arnold's claim on Tinubu and the US
During the programme, Arnold and Akande engaged in what was described as frank exchanges on the subject. The former Texas mayor was direct in his assertion that the United States would not move to arrest Tinubu, though the interview did not elaborate on the legal or diplomatic basis for that position.
Arnold's comments come as Nigerian journalists and media organisations prepare their coverage of the General Debate, which serves as one of the highest-profile gatherings of world leaders each year at the UN headquarters in New York.
Who is Mike Arnold?
Arnold served as mayor of Blanco, a small city in the Texas Hill Country, and later founded Africa Arise International, an organisation focused on African development and engagement. His appearance on 'Inside Sources' placed him at the centre of a conversation touching on Nigerian politics and US foreign policy posture towards the Tinubu administration.
Akande's interviews across multiple American cities suggest a broader effort by Nigerian media figures to gather perspectives from US-based voices on issues relevant to Nigeria ahead of the UNGA session.
Check out Akande's post on X below:
The case against Tinubu
Legit.ng recalls that in April 2025, the US District Court for the District of Columbia ordered America's law enforcement agencies to release confidential information concerning Tinubu’s alleged involvement in drug trade during a “purported federal investigation in the 1990s. That investigation had led to Tinubu forfeiting some money to the US government in a civil case.
The district court’s order came about two years after an American, Aaron Greenspan, had filed a suit under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) against the Executive Office for US Attorneys, Department of State, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), seeking information about a joint investigation into a Chicago hard drug ring that operated in the 1990s.
The American sought criminal investigative records about four named individuals “allegedly associated with the drug ring: Bola Ahmed Tinubu, Lee Andrew Edwards, Mueez Abegboyega Akande, and Abiodun Agbele.”
This was during the 2023 election period, which saw Tinubu emerge as president.
The issue featured prominently at the Presidential Election Petition Court when his opponents, Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi, challenged the president’s eligibility to contest Nigeria’s presidency. But the election court, in a unanimous decision, dismissed the suits, affirming Mr Tinubu’s election.
This paper also reported that the agencies issued “Glomar responses”, refusing to confirm or deny whether the requested records exist. Greenspan contested those responses at the Department of Justice’s Office of Information Policy (“OIP”).
He accused the law enforcement agencies of violating the FOIA by failing to release within the statutory time “documents relating to purported federal investigations into” Mr Tinubu and one Abiodun Agbele.
But the OIP affirmed the agencies’ refusal.
Three days later, he filed an emergency motion seeking a hearing to compel the US agencies to produce records but was also denied.
Then, in 2025, Judge Howell ruled partly in favour of Greenspan’s case.
The judge noted that the ‘Glomar’ responses asserted by the FBI and DEA are “improper and must be lifted.” He said the FBI and DEA failed to show that they properly invoked FOIA.
Howell said since it was acknowledged that Tinubu was a subject of an investigation involving both the FBI and DEA, “the claim that the Glomar responses were necessary to protect this information from public disclosure is at this point neither logical nor plausible.”
Arnold’s full interview on Tinubu can be watched below on YouTube:
Read more on President Bola Tinubu
- Primate Ayodele releases prophecy on top Tinubu's appointee who may soon be sacked
- President Tinubu to finally sign 4 tax reform bills into law, 'groundbreaking'
Tinubu tells US court to block FBI
Legit.ng earlier reported that President Tinubu filed a response in a US district court arguing that records sought by a researcher are protected under US privacy law.
The case stems from FOIA requests filed by Aaron Greenspan seeking the FBI and DEA files linked to a Chicago drug-involvement investigation from the early 1990s.
Tinubu's lawyers argued that personal curiosity about a foreign leader does not meet the legal threshold for public interest under FOIA.
Source: Legit.ng
