Breaking: New Twist as Natasha Files Counter-Affidavit at Supreme Court, Challenges Akpabio

Breaking: New Twist as Natasha Files Counter-Affidavit at Supreme Court, Challenges Akpabio

  • Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has countered Senate President (SP) Godswill Akpabio’s Supreme Court appeal, arguing procedural compliance and fair hearing
  • Counter-affidavit claimed that Akpabio’s brief exceeds the page limit, allegedly violating court rules during the appeal process
  • The respondents asked the Supreme Court to dismiss Akpabio’s appeal, asserting it undermines a pending appellate judgment

Legit.ng journalist Ridwan Adeola Yusuf has over 9 years of experience covering politics, elections, public affairs, and governance in Nigeria and Africa.

Lokoja, Kogi State - Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, senator representing Kogi central, on Monday, February 2, filed a counter-affidavit before the Supreme Court in opposition to an appeal instituted by the Senate President Godswill Akpabio.

The development arose from proceedings at the court of appeal.

Senator Natasha Akpoti files a counter-affidavit at the Supreme Court, opposing Godswill Akpabio’s appeal in ongoing legal proceedings.
Senator Natasha Akpoti files a counter-affidavit at the Supreme Court, Abuja, challenging Senator Godswill Akpabio’s appeal. Photo credits: Natasha H Akpoti, Godswill Obot Akpabio
Source: Facebook

Natasha challenges Akpabio Supreme Court

Court documents sighted by Legit.ng indicate that the counter-affidavit was deposed to by a senior legislative Aide to Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan and filed in response to Senator Akpabio’s motion on notice dated January 21, 2026.

Read also

Tax laws: Reps deputy spokesperson reacts to Ndume's claims on falsification, "sheer mischief"

The respondents are urging the country’s apex court to dismiss the application entirely, arguing that it lacks any prima facie merit and amounts to an abuse of court process.

According to the counter-affidavit, the court of appeal had already concluded the hearing in the substantive appeal on November 28, 2025, and reserved the matter for verdict.

Respondents fume at Akpabio

The respondents contend that approaching the Supreme Court at this stage amounts to an attempt to interfere with an appellate process that has reached an advanced stage and is awaiting final determination.

The camp of the Kogi lawmaker said the filing further maintains that Senator Akpabio was afforded ample opportunity to present his case before the court of appeal "in strict compliance with the rules of court." They added that the brief of argument filed by Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan was properly before the lower court, procedurally compliant, and was never formally challenged during the proceedings.

Read also

Wike vs Makinde: PDP reacts as court sacks party leaders

Central to the dispute is an alleged breach of the Court of Appeal Rules 2021, which prescribe a maximum of 35 pages for briefs of argument. The respondents contend that while the legal teams representing Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan, the clerk of the National Assembly, and another respondent complied with the page limit, the Senate President filed a brief running well beyond the prescribed limit.

Furthermore, they alleged that the appellant failed to regularise the alleged defect within the timeframe allowed by the rules.

A statement by Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan's team partly reads:

"Consequently, the Court of Appeal is said to have declined to admit the over-length brief and proceeded to hear the appeal based on the valid and properly filed processes before it."
Kogi State lawmaker’s camp asserts that Senator Godswill Akpabio had full opportunity at the court of appeal, and that Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s brief was procedurally compliant and unchallenged.
Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan's camp says SP Godswill Akpabio had a full chance at the court of appeal; Akpoti-Uduaghan’s brief was compliant and unchallenged. Photo credit: Natasha H Akpoti
Source: Facebook

Supreme Court appeal faces challenge

On the substantive legal issues, the respondents argued that the grounds of appeal relied upon by the appellant raise issues of mixed law and fact, insisting that prior leave of court was mandatory before such grounds could be competently filed and maintain that no such leave was sought or obtained, rendering the appeal incompetent ab initio.

The counter-affidavit also addressed complaints relating to adjournment and fair hearing, maintaining that the grant or refusal of an adjournment lies within the discretionary powers of the court. It submitted that the court of appeal exercised its discretion judicially and judiciously and that the appellant was not denied a fair hearing at any stage of the proceedings.

Read also

Wike vs Fubara: Are APC governors worried? Gov Sule opens up

Urging the Supreme Court to dismiss the application, the respondents described the appeal as an attempt to stall or frustrate the delivery of judgment by the court of appeal.

Read more on Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan:

Senator Akpoti reacts to colleague’s death

Earlier, Legit.ng reported that Senator Natasha Akpoti had described the news of her colleague's death as painful.

The embattled Kogi Central lawmaker, in a statement, praised Senator Okey Ezea for his support through her battles.

Source: Legit.ng

Authors:
Ridwan Adeola Yusuf avatar

Ridwan Adeola Yusuf (Current Affairs Editor) Ridwan Adeola Yusuf is a content creator with more than nine years of experience, He is also a Current Affairs Editor at Legit.ng. He holds a Higher National Diploma in Mass Communication from the Polytechnic Ibadan, Oyo State (2014). Ridwan previously worked at Africa Check, contributing to fact-checking research works within the organisation. He is an active member of the Academic Excellence Initiative (AEI). In March 2024, Ridwan completed the full Google News Initiative Lab workshop and his effort was recognised with a Certificate of Completion. Email: ridwan.adeola@corp.legit.ng.