Supreme Court: Lagos Government Sues National Assembly Over Proposed Game Bill

Supreme Court: Lagos Government Sues National Assembly Over Proposed Game Bill

  • Lagos State has asked the Supreme Court for permission to begin contempt proceedings against the National Assembly over a proposed gaming bill
  • The state claims the bill breaches a 2024 judgment that ruled federal legislation on lottery and gaming unconstitutional
  • Legal experts say the move could redefine the limits of federal power and reinforce judicial authority in Nigeria

The Lagos State Government has asked the Supreme Court for permission to begin contempt proceedings against the National Assembly, accusing it of breaching a standing judgment that declared federal control over lottery and gaming unconstitutional.

Read also

Former Nigerian governor Timipre Sylva placed on FBI, Interpol watchlists, reasons emerge

In a motion filed by the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Lagos is seeking leave to initiate enforcement of the Supreme Court’s ruling via Form 48 — a legal notice that serves as a formal warning under Nigerian law. If ignored, it may lead to committal to prison.

Supreme Court: Lagos Government Sues National Assembly Over Proposed Game Bill
Supreme Court: Lagos Government Sues National Assembly Over Proposed Game Bill
Source: Twitter

The state’s legal team, led by Bode Olanipekun (SAN), argued that the National Assembly’s ongoing review of the proposed Central Gaming Bill directly violates the apex court’s decision in SC.1/2008: Attorney-General of Lagos State & Ors. v. Attorney-General of the Federation & Ors., delivered on November 22, 2024.

Lagos challenges federal gaming bill clauses

In its affidavit, Lagos claimed that several sections of the bill, especially clauses 7 and 21–64, deal with lottery and gaming, despite the Supreme Court’s ruling that such matters fall outside federal legislative powers.

Read also

Calls to sack INEC chairman Amupitan grow over ‘Christian genocide’ legal brief

The state said these clauses closely resemble those in the now-voided National Lottery Act, which the court struck down in 2024.

The affidavit further noted that both the invalidated law and the new bill define “lottery” and “online gaming” in similar terms, covering games of chance or skill that require a licence.

Lagos also highlighted Clause 62 of the bill, which aims to preserve actions taken under the nullified law, calling it “a deliberate attempt to undermine the Supreme Court’s authority.”

Read also

NDIC now empowered to prosecute those behind bank collapses in Nigeria

State jurisdiction over lottery and gaming

Lagos stressed that since the 2024 judgment, no changes had been made to the Second Schedule of the 1999 Constitution, which outlines the Exclusive and Concurrent Legislative Lists, to include lottery or gaming. This, the state argued, confirms that such matters remain under state control.

In its landmark ruling, the Supreme Court had held that regulation of lottery and gaming lies outside the National Assembly’s powers, rejecting claims that federal authority could be inferred from Item 62 (trade and commerce) or the interstate nature of gaming operations.

Read also

Trump issues pardons to allies involved in efforts to overturn 2020 election, full list emerges

By returning to the Supreme Court, Lagos is seeking to enforce the judgment through contempt proceedings, a move that could shape future interpretations of legislative boundaries and reaffirm the authority of Nigeria’s highest court.

Lagos government warns national assembly over central gaming bill

Legit.ng earlier reported that the Lagos State Government has issued a stern warning to the National Assembly, urging it to halt progress on the proposed Central Gaming Bill, which it described as a direct breach of the Nigerian Constitution and a standing Supreme Court judgement.

Speaking at a press briefing in Lagos, the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr Lawal Pedro, SAN, stated that the Bill, currently before the Senate following its passage by the House of Representatives, represents legislative overreach and could ignite a constitutional crisis.

Source: Legit.ng

Authors:
Basit Jamiu avatar

Basit Jamiu (Current Affairs and Politics Editor) Basit Jamiu is a journalist with more than five years of experience. He is a current affairs and politics editor at Legit.ng. He holds a bachelor's degree from Ekiti State University (2018). Basit previously worked as a staff writer at Ikeja Bird (2022), Associate Editor at Prime Progress (2022), and Staff Writer at The Movee (2018). He is a 2024 Open Climate Fellow (West Africa), 2023 MTN Media Fellow, OCRP Fellow at ICIR, and Accountability Fellow at CJID. Email: basit.jamiu@corp.legit.ng.