INEC Speaks on When It'll Decide on Implications of Supreme Court Judgment on Candidates' Nomination

INEC Speaks on When It'll Decide on Implications of Supreme Court Judgment on Candidates' Nomination

  • INEC national commissioner Mohammed Haruna confirmed the commission will hold a meeting next week to review the September 24 Supreme Court judgment
  • Haruna warned that some political parties may be barred from fielding candidates, including governorship candidates, over membership register violations
  • The Supreme Court restored sections of the Electoral Act 2026 requiring parties to submit membership registers at least 21 days before primaries

Legit.ng journalist Ridwan Adeola Yusuf has over eight years of experience covering metro, government policies and international affairs.

FCT, Abuja - The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) says it will hold an internal meeting next week to decide what action to take following the September Supreme Court judgment that restored key provisions of the Electoral Act 2026, with significant consequences for political parties seeking to contest the 2027 general elections.

Mohammed Haruna, INEC national commissioner for information and voter education, made the disclosure on Thursday, October 8, during an interview on Trust Television's Daily Politics programme, acknowledging that the ruling had triggered widespread anxiety among candidates and the general public.

Read also

Oseni Rufai reacts as Peter Obi claims he won 2023 election but has no evidence

Top INEC officials to meet soon following notable Supreme Court verdict ahead of 2027 election
Prof. Joash Amupitan-led INEC to hold key meeting soon ahead of 2027 election s. Photo credit: @inecnigeria
Source: Twitter

Haruna said:

"Definitely, we will meet next week to take a decision on it. I know a lot of people are anxious, not just the candidates themselves; even the public is anxious.
"The Supreme Court has strengthened our hands and said we were right to have insisted that any party that wants to contest must submit the list of its membership three weeks before their primaries. So, we really need to sit down and look at it. By next week, we will do that and take a decision."

2027 election: Parties may lose right to field candidates

When asked whether parties could be allowed to change their candidates or submit new names in response to the ruling, Haruna was direct.

"It's too late to do anything. The parties won't even be able to contest. It's like you committed an offence and you want to come and benefit," he said.

He pointed to earlier cases in Zamfara and Plateau states as precedents, noting that parties which failed to comply with electoral law were denied the opportunity to benefit from the process. He added that, depending on the commission's review of the law, some parties could be left without governorship candidates entirely.

Read also

Over 1000 Islamic clerics oppose Tinubu's 2027 re-election bid

A seven-member Supreme Court panel upheld an appeal by INEC and restored sections 77(5), 77(6), 77(7) and 84(2) of the Electoral Act 2026 in a lead judgement delivered by Justice Adamu Jauro. The Court of Appeal had previously voided these provisions in July, but the apex court ruled they were not inconsistent with the 1999 Constitution.

2027 election: What the restored provisions require

Under the restored provisions, section 77(5) of the Electoral Act requires that only party members whose names appear in a register submitted to INEC at least 21 days before a primary, congress or convention may take part in the exercise. Section 77(6) bars any party from using a membership register different from the one it submitted to the Commission. Section 77(7) goes further, stipulating that a party which fails to submit its register within the required timeframe cannot field a candidate for the election.

While the judgment does not name or disqualify any specific candidate for the 2027 elections, the restored provisions open the door to legal challenges against any party's nomination process where compliance is disputed.

Read more on INEC

Read also

Lawmakers who quit APC weigh 3 parties over next move

MURIC, SCSN demand sack of INEC boss

Earlier, Legit.ng reported that the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) called for the immediate sack of the INEC chairman, Prof. Joash Amupitan.

The executive director of the Islamic group, Prof. Ishaq Akintola, posited that Amupitan cannot be trusted.

Similarly, the Supreme Council for Shari’ah in Nigeria (SCSN) urged President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to review Amupitan’s appointment.

Source: Legit.ng

Authors:
Ridwan Adeola Yusuf avatar

Ridwan Adeola Yusuf (Current Affairs Editor) Ridwan Adeola Yusuf is a content writer with more than nine years of experience, He is also a Current Affairs Editor at Legit.ng. He holds a Higher National Diploma in Mass Communication from the Polytechnic Ibadan, Oyo State (2014). Ridwan previously worked at Africa Check, contributing to fact-checking research works within the organisation. He is an active member of the Academic Excellence Initiative (AEI). In March 2024, Ridwan completed the full Google News Initiative Lab workshop and his effort was recognised with a Certificate of Completion. Email: ridwan.adeola@corp.legit.ng.