Southeastern Presidency: David Umahi’s Position by Dr. Celestine George

Southeastern Presidency: David Umahi’s Position by Dr. Celestine George

Editor's note: Igbo leader, Dr. Celestine Perterson George, from the United States of America, in this piece, writes on the southeast region producing the next number one citizen of Nigeria following the declaration of Governor David Umahi.

As the race for the 2023 presidential election gears up, the question of which geo-political zone of the country the next number one citizen of Nigeria should come from is raising lots of dust. In political parties, and on different media outlets, unanimity on this matter is elusive at the moment.

Ondo state governor, Rotimi Akeredolu’s open letter to APC party leadership to take an “unequivocal” stance prior to its impending presidential primaries, echoed views of the southern region. Nonetheless, the zoning poser persists: Which of the southeast, south-south, and south-west should it be? David Umahi argues southeast takes precedence over the rest.

Read also

PDP zoning: Southeast threatens to boycott 2023 election

Dr. Celestine George made a case for Governor Dave Umahi as a qualified presidential material within the APC. Photo credit: Ebonyi state government
Source: Facebook

During a live interview on Politics Today program aired on Channels TV on May 6, 2022, Ebonyi state governor, David Umahi noted a fitting way to justly lay the zoning dilemma to rest. He contended it is the turn of the south-eastern zone to produce a president on the bases of justice, equity, and fairness because the south-west through Olusegun Obasanjo and south-south through Goodluck Jonathan has “tasted” it.

The overly enthusiastic jostle for the presidency—given body language of the north to give up power—by SS and SW politicians exemplifies insensitivity. Where three brothers, Umahi instanced, are to share something in scarce supply two have had, the one yet to have at all should be profusely supported to have it.

PAY ATTENTION: Join Telegram channel! Never miss important updates!

That’s equity and fairness in motion. Injustice is where the two are reluctant to support the one, who had before done the same for the two against all odds. He maintained such a scenario would be tantamount to blackmailing the northern region. Thus, zoning impact should cascade down from north relinquishing power to south projecting the southeast. Any arrangement other than this is hypocritical and a subscription to half-truths.

Read also

Miyetti Allah finally reacts to insecurity in southeast, advises FG on next line of action

Furthermore, Governor Umahi adduced the political event of 1999 where other zones of the country rallied round the southwest to produce the first president of the democratic dispensation; southwesterners Olusegun Obasanjo and Olu Falae only ran for election.

So, throwing support behind one zone is neither strange nor unprecedented. He added that if the southeast won’t be predisposed to produce a president by the southwest and south-south, the north can as well contest and retain power. Clamouring for zoning and keeping mute about the benchmark when it arrives in your region is mischievously inconsistent.

Again, if the zoning standard is to be jettisoned at this juncture, Umahi asserted, it would still be an injustice to the southeast (and northeast) due to the fact the two zones haven’t produced a president. Why would their turn warrant obsoleteness and ruling out of zoning?

Are there connotations southeast is bereft of competent candidates? He emphasized there are people of timber and caliber, including himself, capable of handling presidential duties. Candidates with resounding leadership antecedents, for Nigerians, are now wary of promises.

Read also

Ogun 2023: Former lawmaker Akinlade joins governorship race, picks APC form

From the foregoing, reasons plus points raised by Umahi are reasonable. Objectively, if we are to go by the integral democratic virtue of equity, the southeastern zone should be topping the scale of preference for the presidency in political parties and across the country.

The southeast staunchly stood behind PDP in the past, delivering millions of votes. Its indecisiveness about this issue is disappointing. South-east is no pawn on anyone’s political chessboard. APC can become a bastion of equity and widen its acceptance by acting on these decries. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of

More details in’s step-by-step guide for guest contributors. Contact us if you have any feedback, suggestions, complaints, or compliments.


Online view pixel