- Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the proscribed group, IPOB, has dragged the DSS and the AGF to the Federal High Court for allegedly violating his fundamental human rights
- The DSS and the AGF, however, filed a counter affidavit, denying the allegations contained in the suit filed by Kanu
- At the court on Monday, the presiding judge, Justice Taiwo Taiwo, fixed Monday, February 28, to hear the suit
FCT, Abuja - The Federal High Court, Abuja, has fixed Monday, February 28 to hear a fundamental rights enforcement suit filed by Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), a report by PM News has stated.
The newspaper stated that Justice Taiwo Taiwo fixed the date after counsel to the Department of State Services (DSS), Idowu Awo, informed the court that his clients had a counter affidavit which had not been served on Kanu.
Awo asked the court for more time to effect the service of the application on Kanu’s lawyer, Maxwell Opara.
Kanu's lawyer Opara objects
Reacting, Kanu's lawyer said the request of the DSS lawyer was an attempt to continue to subject his client to solitary confinement and other inhuman treatments.
PAY ATTENTION: Subscribe to Digital Talk newsletter to receive must-know business stories and succeed BIG!
He argued that the counter affidavit by the DSS was already filed out of time.
Meanwhile, the lawyer to the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), Simon Enock, also informed that he had filed a motion for an extension of time to regularise their counter affidavit.
The application was neither opposed to by counsel to the IPOB leader, Opara, nor the DSS lawyer.
Justice Taiwo, who noted that the matter was coming before him for the first time, fixed the matter until Feb. 28 for hearing.
It was learnt that Kanu, through his lawyer, Opara, had sued the director general of the DSS and the office and the AGF.
What Kanu wants
Opara, Kanu's lawyer, wants the respondents while carrying out their lawful duties to abide by the provisions of Chapter 4 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and the Africa Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act; as regards the rights of citizens of Nigeria.
He also urged the court to declare that Kanu, even though a detainee, was entitled to enjoy his freedom of thought, conscience and religion as guaranteed by the law.
The lawyer sought:
“A DECLARATION that the applicant, even though a detainee, is entitled to the enjoyment of his right to dignity of human person as guaranteed under Sections 34(1)(a) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).
“A DECLARATION that the respondents action in continuing to keep the applicant in their detention facility, without transferring him to Kuje Correctional Centre, is subjecting the applicant to mental torture given that it is not the place designated for keeping awaiting trial inmates,” among others."
The lawyer then asked the court to make an order directing the respondents to immediately allow Kanu access to facility and material for the practice of his religion and an order directing them to remove him from solitary confinement, among others.
DSS disagrees, files counter affidavit
In a counter affidavit deposed to by Hamza Pandogari, But the DSS, disagreed with Kanu.
Pandogari averred that Kanu was arrested by personnel of the 1st and 2nd respondents upon reasonable suspicion of his engagement in acts of treason and terrorism by propagating violence against the people of Nigeria under the guise of succession.
The officer said Kanu was the leader of the proscribed organisation known as the IPOB.
He stated that he was currently standing trial on a 15-count charge before Justice Binta Nyako.
Pandogari, who said that though Nyako earlier admitted Kanu to bail sometime in April 2017, he jumped the bail but was rearrested to continue his trial.
The officer said contrary to paragraph 4 (a) and (b) of Kanu’s affidavit, “there is no such order of court that applicant should have unrestricted access to the medial practitioner of his choice while in 1st and 2nd respondent’s custody.”
He also said contrary to the information, Kanu was receiving adequate and quality medical attention when necessary;
“The applicant enjoys direct and unrestricted access to medical practitioners who are experts in their various field of medical practice," Pandogari said.
He averred that Dr O. FASAN, Consultant, Cardiologist from the National Hospital, Abuja; Dr, A OHUNMWANGHO, a Consultant Gastroenterologist, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, and Prof. MBAKWE, Consultant CARDIOLOGIST, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, were among list of experts who had been attending to Kanu’s health.
“That apart from the regular routine medical checkup, applicant gets promptly the required medical attention, upon any request or complaint by applicant relating to his health,” he said.
Court orders Central Bank of Nigeria to pay 110 ABU staff over N2bn, 26 years after they were sacked
According to the officer, the applicant (Kanu) has never missed his trial based on health ground.
He said contrary to the information, the DSS had never tortured Kanu either physically or mentally while in its custody.
“That while in custody, applicant enjoys several privileges including but not limited to entertaining a total number of six visitors of his choice every week, three each on Monday and Thursday, the days set out by the court as applicant’s visiting days,” he added.
I did not violate Kanu's rights - AGF
Meanwhile, in a counter affidavit deposed to by Zakari Friday, the AGF said he did not violate or infringe on any fundamental right (s) of the applicant on account of the facts giving rise to the application as deposed to in the whole paragraphs of the affidavit in support of the application.”
Friday, who averred that Kanu was not in position to professionally determine the competency or otherwise of the medical practitioner attending to him in DSS custody, said the security agency “has a medical clinic well-equipped with highly trained medical personnel that have been attending to the medical needs of the applicant while he remains in the custody.”
Police Commission orders fresh probe into Kyari's link to Hushpuppi after IGP team’s shallow investigations
He also denied that Kanu was being detained in solitary confinement.
According to Friday, he is being detained in a standard and hygienic facility.
Nnamdi Kanu denies being a member of IPOB
Kanu was on Wednesday, January 19, re-arraigned on a 15-count charge of treasonable felony.
When the charges were read to him, the IPOB leader pleaded not guilty. Speaking with journalists shortly after the court session, Labaran said, Kanu “vehemently” denied being an IPOB member.