Lagos: Thought Leader Reacts to Makoko Demolition as Victims Share Painful Tales
- For decades, tens of thousands of people have lived in homes on stilts above the lagoon in Makoko, one of Africa’s oldest and largest waterfront communities
- More than 3,000 homes have been torn down and 10,000 people displaced in this latest wave of demolitions that began in December 2025, according to a coalition of local advocacy groups
- Lagos State governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, defended the evictions, citing safety risks, while journalist Sola Onamodu noted that communities had indeed encroached on critical infrastructure
Legit.ng journalist Ridwan Adeola Yusuf has over 9 years of experience covering metro.
Makoko, Lagos State - A journalist and prominent thought leader, Sola Onamodu, on Monday, February 2, 2026, alleged that some misleading claims are fueling the Makoko demolition narrative.
Legit.ng reports that residents of Makoko, a century-old waterfront community in Lagos, are protesting a months-long demolition they fear will displace thousands of families and clear the way for developers.

Read also
Insecurity: Agunechemba speaks on fresh moves to tackle violent crimes in Lilu, Anambra community

Source: Twitter
Authorities say the makeshift homes in Makoko are unsafe and must be removed to ensure sanitation and security. Residents, however, claim the sudden demolitions began without warning and have already resulted in fatalities. Many report that fear has brought daily life in the community to a standstill.
Scenes of chaos have become increasingly common in the fishing community. Charred planks floating in the water mark where homes once stood.
According to the government, the demolition is necessary in part to protect residents from a high-voltage power line running through the area. However, residents argue that the rules keep changing. In 2025, they were told homes could not be within 100 feet of the power line. Days later, that distance was reportedly increased to 300 feet.
Civic organisations stated that demolitions have extended far beyond those limits, in some cases as much as 1,600 feet.
Wading into the controversial demolition in Makoko, Onamodu, via a statement exclusively obtained by Legit.ng, shared what he called 'the true picture of things.'

Read also
Estimated cost of treating snakebite in Nigerian hospitals mentioned after death of gospel singer
He noted that while the demolition has undeniably caused hardship, government officials argue that much of the public conversation has been shaped by emotion-driven narratives that overlook legal, environmental, and safety considerations.
Below is Onamodu's explainer examining 9 major claims often circulated about the Makoko demolition:
1. “Makoko was completely demolished”
Multiple sources and checks confirm this claim is false. Only structures directly under the power lines and those encroaching toward the Third Mainland Bridge were removed. The claims and counterclaims over an agreed 30–100 metres buffer clearance attest to this. Makoko, as a community, remains intact.
2. “No compensation or resettlement was planned”
It is a general rule of government that structures built illegally on state-owned waterways do not qualify for compensation under existing laws — a detail often omitted in public narratives. But Babajide Sanwo-Olu, in a viral video, declared that based on compassionate grounds, affected residents would be given palliatives and relocation stipends as compensation.
He stated:
"I have instructed both local governments and the various ministries concerned to see how they also can give additional succour, palliatives, and relocation stipends to some of the people just to show compassion. And to say, you have done wrong, but the government can still show compassion and be compassionate about it. It is to ensure that we all can live in a safe and secure environment.”

Read also
Just In: Fresh calamity as bandits attack, set fire on church, abduct several residents in Niger
3. “Residents were evicted overnight without warning”
Officials insist that notices were issued over time, particularly to occupants of structures built directly on waterways marked as unsafe or illegal.
Lagos Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu disclosed that the exercise, initially scheduled for December 2024, was repeatedly delayed and extended throughout 2025 in the hope of voluntary compliance. Other sources say there were initial warnings that predated the Sanwo-Olu administration.

Source: Twitter
4. “The demolition targeted the poor”
Data contradict this claim, supporting the authorities’ position that enforcement actions are not based on social class. The data show that similar demolitions have occurred in both low-income and high-income areas when regulations are violated.
While much of the public focus has been on demolitions in informal, low-income settlements like Makoko and Oworonshoki, it is on record that enforcement has also been carried out in more established, higher-income neighbourhoods such as Ikeja GRA and areas connected to Ikoyi/Banana Island.
Checks revealed "illegal structures" in Ikeja GRA and Ikoyi/Banana Island, particularly suffered the same fate in the first quarter of 2025.
5. “Makoko residents legally own the land and water”
This position is contrary to the constitutional provision. The state disputes this narrative with the assertion that lagoons and waterways are public assets, and insists that the demolished structures lacked legal title or planning approval. Under Section 44 of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the Land Use Act (1978), all land in Lagos, including waterways and lagoons, vests in the Governor in trust for the public.
Structures without legal title or planning approval breach the Lagos State Urban and Regional Planning Law, giving authorities the legal right to remove unauthorised buildings to protect public safety, drainage, and navigation.
6. “The governor personally ordered the demolition”
Officials say the exercise followed standing urban planning, environmental, and safety regulations, carried out by relevant agencies rather than a personal directive.
With sources insisting there were earlier warnings to those affected, predated Sanwo-Olu's administration, the governor stated that the decision of the government was based on the collective interest of Lagos State and the residents and not for any ulterior motive.
7. “Children were abandoned with no support”
Authorities counter this claim with the explanation that many viral images used to push this narrative lacked context, and that some community groups, NGOs, and institutions are furthering self-serving ends.
Sanwo-Olu addressed the issue recently:
"We have our responsibility. We know what we are meant to do. Sometimes you see some NGOs who are collecting thousands of dollars from donor countries, going around to make videos of two or three children, saying, 'You miss school today, you miss school tomorrow,' just for their pecuniary rewards. It is a shame.
"I want people to be rest assured that we are not about taking anything away from anybody; we are just trying to make life better for our people."
8. “There was no safety or environmental reason”
Experts describe Makoko as not just a community, but a dense human ecosystem built around water, wood, and survival. But beneath its fragile resilience lies an invisible threat Lagos authorities say they could no longer ignore: high-tension power lines running through tightly packed waterfront homes, where a single fault could spiral into mass tragedy.
Urban safety experts note that disasters linked to power infrastructure in dense informal settlements are rarely contained.
A single spark can ignite wood-and-fuel structures, overwhelm narrow waterways, disable power across districts, and trap sleeping residents before help arrives.
Government cites fire hazards, flooding risks, blocked navigation routes, pollution, and security concerns as key reasons for clearing waterfront structures.
9. "The land is being cleared for luxury development”
Government has denied any approved private development plans for the cleared zones, describing them as strictly "buffer areas" meant for environmental and maritime safety.
The state has vigorously pushed back against claims that the exercise was designed to clear land for elite development, alleging that some local and international NGOs have profited from portraying Makoko as perpetually unsafe without delivering promised interventions.
Read more Lagos news:
- Lagos to recover unpaid taxes through tenants, banks, debtors, others
- Reactions as Lagos budget 10 times larger than 1 southern state in latest breakdown
FG demolishes 22 Lagos structures
Earlier, Legit.ng reported that 22 "illegal structures" under the Iddo Bridge in Lagos State were demolished by the federal government of Nigeria.
The federal minister of works, Engineer Dave Umahi, inspected the bridge along with a team of structural engineers and representatives from a notable construction firm, Julius Berger Nigeria.
Source: Legit.ng


