Air Peace Loses Court Case as Judge Backs FCCPC on Passenger Complaints, Refund Issues

Air Peace Loses Court Case as Judge Backs FCCPC on Passenger Complaints, Refund Issues

  • The Federal High Court dismissed Air Peace’s suit against the FCCPC for lack of merit
  • The court affirmed that the FCCPC has the legal authority to investigate consumer complaints
  • The dispute stemmed from complaints about flight cancellations and ticket refund issues

Oluwatobi Odeyinka is a business editor at Legit.ng, covering energy, the money market, technology and macroeconomic trends in Nigeria.

The Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed a suit filed by Air Peace Limited seeking to stop the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) from issuing summons over passenger complaints.

Justice James Omotosho, in a ruling delivered on Monday, held that the airline’s case lacked merit and could not stand, Premium Times and PUNCH reported.

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday dismissed a suit filed by Air Peace Limited seeking to stop the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) from issuing summons over multiple complaints from passengers nationwide
Air Peace’s argument on the denial of a fair hearing was rejected as premature. Photo: Air Peace.
Source: Getty Images

Court affirms FCCPC’s investigative powers

Delivering judgment, the court said the airline’s action appeared aimed at shielding itself from a lawful investigation by a regulatory body.

The judge cited provisions of the FCCPC Act, noting that the commission has the authority to handle consumer complaints and initiate investigations where necessary.

Read also

Group threatens to shut down Nigerian ports over 16 years unpaid benefits, issues 7-day ultimatum

He explained that under Section 148 of the law, the FCCPC can assess complaints, dismiss those deemed frivolous, refer matters to relevant regulators, or direct investigations through its inspectors.

The court further held that the law empowers the commission to act independently without external restrictions.

Argument on due process rejected

The court also dismissed Air Peace’s claim that it was denied fair hearing due to the FCCPC’s refusal to disclose the identities of complainants.

Justice Omotosho ruled that the argument was premature, noting that the commission had already issued several summons inviting the airline to appear.

He added that the airline must comply with the summons and present its case before the commission.

Background to the dispute

The case followed a series of complaints received by the FCCPC in late 2024 from passengers across Nigeria. The issues raised included alleged non-refund of ticket fares and flight cancellations.

According to the commission, it initiated preliminary engagement with the airline in line with its mandate to protect consumers.

However, Air Peace rejected the move, arguing that aviation-related matters fall under the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA).

Read also

FCCPC says it did not ban airtime, data borrowing service after MTN, Airtel’s decision

The airline also insisted that it should not be investigated without disclosure of the identities of those who lodged complaints.

The disagreement escalated after the FCCPC made public comments on the complaints and airline pricing practices.

At the time, the Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, called for better coordination among regulators, noting that aviation matters require sector-specific oversight.

FCCPC summons and legal action

In June 2025, the FCCPC issued a summons directing Air Peace to appear at its Abuja office over the complaints, warning that failure to comply could lead to sanctions.

The airline subsequently approached the court, asking it to restrain the commission from continuing its investigation.

Air Peace argued that the FCCPC lacked the authority to proceed without first referring the matter to a sector regulator or disclosing the identities of complainants.

The Federal High Court has dismissed Air Peace's suit against the FCCPC for lack of merit, seeking to stop the from issuing summons over passenger complaints.
The court affirmed that the FCCPC has the legal authority to investigate consumer complaints. Photo: FCCPC.
Source: Twitter

FCCPC defends mandate

In its response, the FCCPC maintained that its actions were within the law, stating that it could act on consumer complaints or initiate investigations independently.

The commission also referenced provisions of the FCCPC Act, which guarantee consumers the right to timely and fair refunds where services are not delivered as agreed.

Read also

Court halts FCCPC digital lending regulations as MTN suspends data, airtime credit service

The court’s ruling effectively clears the way for the commission to continue its investigation into the complaints against the airline.

Keyamo reacts to airlines’ planned shutdown

Legit.ng earlier reported that the Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, called on domestic airlines to reconsider plans to suspend operations amid the sharp increase in aviation fuel prices.

His appeal follows a warning by the Airline Operators of Nigeria that local carriers may halt flights from April 20 due to escalating costs of Jet A1 fuel.

The minister cautioned that fare increases or shutdowns could negatively affect the economy.

Source: Legit.ng

Authors:
Oluwatobi Odeyinka avatar

Oluwatobi Odeyinka (Business Editor) Oluwatobi Odeyinka is a Business Editor at Legit.ng. He reports on markets, finance, energy, technology, and macroeconomic trends in Nigeria. Before joining Legit.ng, he worked as a Business Reporter at Nairametrics and as a Fact-checker at Ripples Nigeria. His features on energy, culture, and conflict have also appeared in reputable national and international outlets, including Africa Oil+Gas Report, HumAngle, The Republic Journal, The Continent, and the US-based Popula. He is a West African Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) Journalism Fellow.