Google shares plunge after Apple executive's court testimony

Google shares plunge after Apple executive's court testimony

US Judge Amit Mehta will determine how Google must address his landmark ruling last year that Google operates an illegal monopoly in online search
US Judge Amit Mehta will determine how Google must address his landmark ruling last year that Google operates an illegal monopoly in online search. Photo: NICHOLAS KAMM / AFP
Source: AFP

Shares in Google parent Alphabet plunged more than eight percent on Wednesday after Apple executive Eddy Cue testified in federal court that Google's search traffic on Apple devices declined last month for the first time in over two decades.

Cue, Apple's senior vice president of services, told the Washington antitrust trial that Google was losing ground to AI alternatives like ChatGPT and Perplexity.

His revelation that this decline "has never happened in 22 years" sent shockwaves through Wall Street, wiping more than $170 billion from Google's market capitalization in a single trading session.

The testimony came during a pivotal trial where District Judge Amit Mehta will determine remedies for Google's previously ruled illegal search monopoly.

The case, ongoing since 2020, has exposed Google's practice of paying Apple tens of billions dollars annually to remain the default search engine on Safari browsers and Apple smartphones.

Investors were further unsettled when Cue suggested Apple might soon offer AI alternatives as default search options on its devices, heightening concerns that Google's advertising revenue could face serious threats from AI competitors.

With the three-week trial set to conclude Friday, government attorneys are pushing Judge Mehta to order Google to divest its Chrome browser.

They argue that AI technologies will only strengthen Google's dominance by leveraging its vast data resources across products like Maps, YouTube, and Chrome to stifle competition.

However, Cue's testimony bolstered Google's defense that AI is already disrupting its search dominance, with chatbots now posing legitimate threats to its business model.

'Losing sleep'

When Judge Mehta issues his ruling in August, he could end Google's default search agreements with Apple and others -- a prospect that Cue told the court he was "losing sleep" over, with potential revenue losses impacting Apple's product development and operating system investment.

Alternatively, Mehta might order Google to share its search data with competitors, which CEO Sundar Pichai warned would effectively amount to a "de facto divestiture of search."

As a counter offer, Google proposes a more limited remedy that would allow it to continue paying for default placement of its search engine, but with an annual renegotiations and greater freedom for smartphone manufacturers to choose which Google apps to install on their devices.

The Google case represents just one of five major tech antitrust actions currently pursued by the US government, with Meta facing similar scrutiny in the same courthouse.

Google recently lost a separate case regarding its ad technology business and may face additional divestitures, while Apple and Amazon are also expected to confront antitrust challenges in US courts.

PAY ATTENTION: Сheck out news that is picked exactly for YOU ➡️ find the “Recommended for you” block on the home page and enjoy!

Source: AFP

Authors:
AFP avatar

AFP AFP text, photo, graphic, audio or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. AFP news material may not be stored in whole or in part in a computer or otherwise except for personal and non-commercial use. AFP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions in any AFP news material or in transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages whatsoever. As a newswire service, AFP does not obtain releases from subjects, individuals, groups or entities contained in its photographs, videos, graphics or quoted in its texts. Further, no clearance is obtained from the owners of any trademarks or copyrighted materials whose marks and materials are included in AFP material. Therefore you will be solely responsible for obtaining any and all necessary releases from whatever individuals and/or entities necessary for any uses of AFP material.