Ibrahim Magu: Sagay says those probing EFCC boss are his accusers

Ibrahim Magu: Sagay says those probing EFCC boss are his accusers

- The charges against Ibrahim Magu are still generating polarised opinions across quarters

- Prof Itse Sagay has faulted the Ayo Salami-led presidential panel probing the embattled EFCC boss

- The PACAC chairman said those probing Magu are his accusers which is bad for the ongoing investigation

PAY ATTENTION: Click “See First” under the “Following” tab to see Legit.ng News on your Facebook News Feed!

An eminent law professor, Itse Sagay, has said that the charges against Ibrahim Magu are still "allegations in petition" and thus cannot be used against the suspended Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) boss until solid evidence are established.

Sagay, who is chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC), made this known in a statement on Monday, August 10, while making his stand known on the investigation being carried out by retired justice Ayo Salami-led committee.

The law professor said it is wrong to use the shreds of evidence presented by people and agencies under the probe of EFCC against the embattled anti-graft czar.

Coronavirus: Traders reveal hike in cost of food items as Easter beckons

Sagay also faulted the composition of the Salami-led probe panel, saying it is only the president of the appeal court that has no personal interest in Magu's case.

Sagay attacks Salami panel, faults suspects’ testimonies against Magu

Prof Itse Sagay has faulted the Ayo Salami-led panel probing the embattled EFCC boss. Credit: The Nation.
Source: UGC

According to him, other people who constituted the presidential investigation panel are not neutral, hence the reason pieces of evidence are being taken "behind Magu’s back."

Sagay further emphasised that those probing Magu, according to his research, are his accusers who he might have stepped on their toes.

“Justice Salami appears to be the only neutral person on the panel," the PACAC president stated.

“I criticised the Salami panel for taking evidence from the accusers behind Magu’s back and for not giving him the petitions against him in advance of his defence.

“Also from the reports we read, the panel is packed with representatives of the DSS (Department of State Services), the Ministry of Justice and others from security agencies. These are also his accusers."

Kogi guber: Huge number of APC aspirants is due to my efforts, says Gov Bello

Magu is being grilled following a petition by the minister of justice and attorney general Abubakar Malami, accusing the anti-corruption sheriff of insubordination and alleged relooting of recovered funds.

PAY ATTENTION: Install our latest app for Android, read the best news on Nigeria’s #1 news app

Earlier, Legit.ng reported that Magu challenged Malami to produce evidence of the allegations against him.

The embattled EFCC boss while appearing at the Presidential Investigation Panel in Abuja refuted corruption allegations leveled against him by Malami who is also the minister of justice.

Magu in a 26-page statement of defence insisted that the petition against him is false and untrue, adding that it is targeted at destroying his hard-earned reputation as an incorruptible officer.

Magu: Why did Buhari leave EFCC for Police people? | Legit TV

Source: Legit.ng

Online view pixel