Embattled IPOB Leader Kanu Asks Court to Halt Judgement, Files Multiple Fresh Motions

Embattled IPOB Leader Kanu Asks Court to Halt Judgement, Files Multiple Fresh Motions

  • Nnamdi Kanu has filed multiple motions seeking to halt the scheduled judgement on his terrorism trial at the Federal High Court in Abuja
  • He urged the court to refer key legal questions to the Court of Appeal and challenged the jurisdiction of the trial court
  • The prosecution had asked the judge to dismiss all applications and proceed with delivering judgement

The leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, has asked the Federal High Court in Abuja to halt its planned judgement on the terrorism charges brought against him by the Federal Government.

The matter was earlier fixed for decision on November 7, but Kanu returned to court with multiple motions aimed at stopping the process.

Read also

At last, court sentences top ISWAP commander after years of trial delays

Nnamdi Kanu appears in court on judgment day.
Nnamdi Kanu appears in court as he presented multiple motions challenging the proceedings.
Source: Twitter

Justice James Omotosho confirmed that several applications were filed after the last adjournment. The judge merged the motions and allowed Kanu, who is conducting his own defence, to present each one, Vanguard reported.

Kanu Seeks Referral To Appeal Court

Kanu told the court in his first application dated November 12 that certain legal questions that arose during the trial should be sent to the Court of Appeal for interpretation. He said the trial ought to pause until the appellate court rules on those issues.

He maintained that the charges were defective from the onset because, according to him, they were anchored on a law that does not exist.

He added that the Supreme Court had already noted that count 7 of the charge had no basis in law. He also claimed that the evidence led by the prosecution had collapsed under scrutiny and complained that he was denied fair hearing.

Read also

US lawmakers overwhelmingly back bill ordering release of Epstein files

Defendant Challenges Court’s Jurisdiction

Kanu further argued that the court was wrong to waive his right to file a final written address before fixing a date for judgement.

In a separate motion, he asked to be released on bail on what he called liberal terms. He told the court that continued detention violated his constitutional rights.

The prosecution, represented by Senior Advocate of Nigeria Adegboyega Awomolo, urged the court to reject all the applications. He asked the judge to disregard the fresh motions and deliver judgement as earlier scheduled.

Source: Legit.ng

Authors:
Ibrahim Sofiyullaha avatar

Ibrahim Sofiyullaha (Editorial Assistant) Ibrahim Sofiyullaha is a graduate of First Technical University, Ibadan. He was the founder and pioneer Editor-in-Chief of a fast-rising campus journalism outfit at his university. Ibrahim is a coauthor of the book Julie, or Sylvia, written in collaboration with two prominent Western authors. He was ranked as the 9th best young writer in Africa by the International Sports Press Association. Ibrahim has contributed insightful articles for major platforms, including Sportskeeda in the UK and Motherly in the United States. Email: ibrahim.sofiyullaha@corp.legit.ng