Frivolous petition bill is not meant for self- vindication - CJN

Frivolous petition bill is not meant for self- vindication - CJN

- The public hearing of the frivolous petition bill held at the senate on Monday, March 7 2016

- The Chief Justice of Nigeria, Mohammed Mahmud said that freedom of expression has its limits

- The bill seeks to make illegal the common act of individuals who send frivolous petitions to tarnish the image of people

Frivolous petition bill is not meant for self- vindication - CJN

Chief Justice of Nigeria, Mahmud Mohammed

The Chief Justice of Nigeria, Mahmud Mohammed on Monday, March 7 said that the frivolous petition bill is not for self vindication but freedom of expression.

This statement was made by Clara Ogunbiyi, who represented the Chief Justice of Nigeria at the public hearing of the bill.

She said that frivolous petitions have been the order of the day across board in all tiers of government.

She said although there is freedom of speech, there freedom of expression within its ambit of the constitution as laudable as it may seem.

Mrs Ogunbiyi said there must be limits to adhere to especially with the exuberant, frivolous and unguarded write-ups in the print media, social media platform like Facebook and Twitter.

She added that the right to freedom in Nigeria has been overlooked while many established democracies across the world have enacted freedom of information regime.

"Before now, Nigerians regarded freedom of information as a luxury which was only practicable in the Western world.

"Citizens must rely on confirmed reports . In a country where freedom of information act is in operation, anyone can make a request for information.

READ ALSO: Bill Proposes Tough Penalty For Whoever Abuses Social Media

"There are no restrictions on your age, nationality or where you live. Although some information can be withheld to protect various interest which are allowed.

"In a democratic world, the public is expected to have access to information not only on how they are governed but the interest to to individual or group," she said.

However, she argued that a consequential effect is where government officials themselves fail to benefit from public input which could ease their decision making.

While making contributions, she stated the advantages of the bill which includes to bring the constitutional provision of freedom of opinion within bounds and not at large.

Also to safeguard the rights and privileges provided under the constitution against all forms of frivolous abuse and for purpose of ensuring the only genuine and profitable complaints are lodged against the individuals, corporate and government.

Mrs Ogunbiyi added that the bill will serve as the purpose of verifying the origin and authenticity of the complaint and the complainant which serves to bring out the merits and demerits of the petition.

"The suggestive time limit within which a complaint or petition must be made is within six months of the event.

"Subjects to extension of this limit for making complaints musts be dismissed by the regulatory body concerned," she said.

Godswill Akpabio, the Senate majority leader said the bill is not intended in gaping anyone's opinion but aimed at frivolity and thanked the Mrs Ogunbiyi for dissecting the bill in the manner she did.

"Its not just a function of safeguarding democracy but also safeguarding the finance. The reason why we are having difficulties is because some are based on envy, frivolity and jealousy," he said.

James Manager representing Delta south senatorial district commended the CJN representative saying that the insight given by Mrs Ogunbiyi were his thoughts on the matter.

READ ALSO: Senate Denies Passing Bill Proposing Tough Penalty Social Media Abusers

There has been controversies based on the frivolous petition bill which caused a great stir on social media.

The bill titled An Act to prohibit frivolous petitions and other related matters according to the senate makes no mention of jailing social media users.

It also read that the bill seeks to make illegal, the common act of individuals sponsoring frivolous petitions to tarnish or blackmail public servants or political office holders for selfish purposes.

Source: Legit

Mailfire view pixel