Opinion: The unanswered questions about Dr Anu Adepoju’s case with FCCPC by Adekunle Samson

Opinion: The unanswered questions about Dr Anu Adepoju’s case with FCCPC by Adekunle Samson

Editor's note: In this piece, Adekunle Samson has reacted to the legal battle between the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) and Dr. Anuoluwapo Adepoju of Med Contour Medical and Laser clinic.

Samson posed some lingering questions about the involvement of the FCCPC's CEO, Babatunde Irukera in the case.

PAY ATTENTION: Click “See First” under the “Following” tab to see Legit.ng News on your Facebook News Feed!

Social media has been abuzz in the last few days with the news of the arrest and purported arraignment of Dr Anuoluwapo Adepoju of Med Contour Medical and Laser clinic, a Lagos-based medical doctor, by the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) over the death of one of her clients, Mrs Nneka Onwuzuligbo.

The FCCPC had in a five-count charge brought against the surgeon, Anuoluwapo, and her cosmetic surgery firm Med Contour Ltd, alleged that the defendants shunned its investigation into the case and declined to produce documents required by the commission.

Read also

Coronavirus: Traders reveal hike in cost of food items as Easter beckons

Opinion: The unanswered questions about Dr Anu Adepoju’s case with the FCCPC
Dr. Anu of Medcontour.
Source: UGC

The commission’s Chief Executive Officer Babatunde Irukera in the charge accused Anuoluwapo of failure “or refusal to appear before the FCCPC in compliance with a summons as required by law. “Failure to produce documents in compliance with the commission’s notice of investigation as required by law” and “Impeding, preventing or obstructing the commission’s investigation.”

Irukera alleged that the incidents happened between April 15 and May 4, 2020, at No. 11a Ladi Alakija Street, Lekki Phase 1, Lagos.” He alleged that Anuoluwapo’s conduct contravened sections 33(3)(a) and 113(4)(a) of the FCCPC Act 2018 and was liable to be punished under sections 33(3) and 113(1) of the same Act, among others.

In a six-paragraph affidavit of completion of investigation attached to the charge, the commission stated that it received complaints from three petitioners, Marlene Oluwakemi, Taiwo Temilade and Vivian Onwuzuligbo alleging that Dr Anuoluwapo’s body enhancement business “are unsafe for consumers and that the surgeon made “false, misleading and deceptive representation in relation to the marketing of their services.”

Read also

Xenophobia: Nigerians are worse than South Africans - Comedian Hyenana reacts to ongoing protest in Nigeria

It said, “In particular, the above-mentioned Vivian Onwuzuligbo, a member of the Mrs Nnneka Onwuzuligbo (now deceased) alleged that the deceased died as a result of the failed defendants’ cosmetic surgery and she is privy to the events that led to the demise of the deceased.” Anuoluwapo pleaded not guilty to the charge after it was read to her. However, the events of the last few days by the FCCPC and its chief executive officer who is also the prosecuting counsel, Mr. Babatunde Irukera, have drawn the curious eyes of the public over the handling of the case.

Opinion: The unanswered questions about Dr Anu Adepoju’s case with the FCCPC
Babatunde Irukera of FCCPC and Dr. Anu Adepoju.
Source: UGC

The recent actions of Barr Irukera have raised eyebrows and questions are being asked as to his personal involvement in the case which one would say borders on vendetta.

Some of the questions begging for answers over the case are:

Why would Mr. Irukera the CEO of a federal government agency personally come to Lagos from Abuja and invade Dr Anu’s clinic with a team of policemen without a search warrant or any legal backing of any sort?

Read also

9 Facts about Forbes under 30 Nigerian Obinwanne Okeke accused of $12m fraud

How else can we explain why the FCCPC would get involved in a case that is outside its jurisdiction? One would think the involvement of the CEO of the FCCPC will ensure that the agency follows the tenets of the rule of law.

According to several sources, Barr Irukera filed information about Dr Anu since the 3rd of June 2020 and did not serve her a copy as demanded by law. She only became aware of the charges in court on the 3rd of July 2020.

It is high time the honourable minister of health, Dr Osagie Ehanire, and other relevant medical authorities cautioned Mr Irukera as he has no grounds to harass Dr Adepoju.

The vice president, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, should immediately call Mr Irukera to order. He should be compelled to stop dragging the name of a well-respected individual in the mud with his gutter tactics.

This is also a clarion call on the president, Muhammadu Buhari to look into Mr Irukera’s activities as they are not befitting of the prestigious office which he holds. His actions bring disrepute to the efforts of Mr President to better the lot of Nigerians.

Read also

Buhari vs Atiku: What international media say about Nigeria’s main presidential candidates

God bless Nigeria.

Your own opinion articles are welcome at info@corp.legit.ng— drop an email telling us what you want to write about and why. More details in Legit.ng’s step-by-step guide for guest contributors.

Contact us if you have any feedback, suggestions, complaints or compliments. We are also available on Twitter.

PAY ATTENTION: Do you have news to share? Contact Legit.ng instantly

I was blackmailed, I do not do blood rituals on my patients - Dr Anu | Legit TV

Source: Legit

Online view pixel