Academic qualification: Appeal Court decides Buhari’s fate on July 12

Academic qualification: Appeal Court decides Buhari’s fate on July 12

- Court of Appeal sitting Abuja will deliver judgement on President Buhari's eligibility to contest February 23 presidential election on Friday, July 12

- Kalu Kalu, Labaran Ismail and Hassy El-Kuris had told the court that Buhari was not qualified to contest the election

- The appellants prayed the court to nullify Buhari’s participation in the election because he was not educationally qualified for the poll

The Abuja division of the Court of Appeal will on Friday, July 12, deliver judgment in a suit challenging the academic qualification of President Muhammadu Buhari to contest the February 23, presidential election.

Nigerian Tribune reports that a three-member panel of the Court of Appeal presided over by Justice Atinuke Akomolafe-Wilson, had on Monday, July 8, reserved judgment in the suit after listening to the argument canvassed by counsel to parties in the matter.

READ ALSO: Take over Edo if you can - Obaseki dares Oshiomhole, others

Legit.ng gathered that the court had held that date for its judgment would be communicated to parties.

But as the 60-day time frame allowed by law for the hearing of the matter expires on July 12, the court on Thursday, July 11, communicated to parties of its readiness to deliver its judgment on Friday, July 12.

It would be recalled that Kalu Kalu, Labaran Ismail and Hassy El-Kuris, had approached the appellate court to nullify and set aside the judgment of the Abuja division of the Federal High Court which declined to hear their suit instituted to challenge the educational qualification of Buhari before the conduct of the 2019 general election.

At the last sitting, counsel to the appellant, Ukpai Ukairo, insisted that President Buhari was not educationally qualified to have stood for the presidential poll on the grounds that the required certificates were not attached to his form CF001, submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for clearance to contest the presidential poll.

The counsel denied the claim that the suit of the appellants was statute-barred, adding that the case was instituted on November 5, 2018, within the 14 days allowed by law.

He said the cause of action started with the announcement and publication by INEC of successful candidates for the 2019 general election on October 25, 2018.

Ukairo, therefore, urged the Court of Appeal to allow the appeal and set aside the decision of the Federal High Court on grounds of miscarriage of justice.

He asked the court to nullify Buhari’s participation in the February 23 presidential election because he was not educational qualified for the poll at the time he did.

However, lawyers to the first and second respondents urged the court to dismiss the appeal for being incompetent and lacking merit.

Buhari’s counsel, Abdullahi Abubakar, specifically told the appeal court that the case of the appellant was statute-barred, having not been filed within the mandatory period stipulated by the law.

He urged the court to uphold the decision of the Federal High Court to the effect that the suit was not filed in line with the position of the law.

Counsel to the All Progressives Congress (APC), Babatunde Ogala, aligned himself with Buhari’s submission and urged the court to dismiss the appeal, while counsel to INEC, Onyeri Anthony, said the commission is neutral and would abide by the decision of the court.

The appellants in their appeal are asking the appellate court to reverse the judgment of Justice Ahmed Mohammed on the grounds that the processes filed by Buhari and used to strike out their suit were not competent.

While faulting the judgment of the lower court, which was predicated on the grounds that the suit was statute-barred, the appellants claimed that the Federal High Court erred in law and in its decision because they did not challenge the primary election that produced Buhari as candidate of the APC.

They, therefore, urged the Court of Appeal to assume jurisdiction over the suit and grant all the reliefs sought at the Federal High Court but which were refused.

Among the reliefs were a declaration that Buhari submitted false information regarding his qualification and certificate to INEC for the purpose of contesting election into the office of the President of Nigeria and that he should be disqualified.

They also prayed for an order of court directing INEC to remove Buhari’s name as a candidate of APC and another order restraining Buhari from parading himself as a candidate in the 2019 presidential election and also APC from recognizing Buhari as a candidate.

The Federal High Court had on May 2, declined to grant the request of the appellants on the grounds that the suit was not filed within the time allowed by law and therefore sustained the preliminary objection raised by Buhari at the hearing.

READ ALSO: NAIJ.com upgrades to Legit.ng: a letter from our Editor-in-Chief Bayo Olupohunda

Meanwhile, Legit.ng had previously reported that a Court of Appeal had on Monday, June 24, told the president to respond within five days to the case filed against his qualification for the 2019 presidential election.

NAIJ.com (naija.ng) -> Legit.ng We have upgraded to serve you better.

How Nigeria's democracy has fared in the last 20 years - Jega, Ezekwesili | - on Legit TV

Source: Legit

Mailfire view pixel